Tell Us Your Thoughts: Should Pharmacists Be Allowed to Refuse Dispensing Birth Control Pills on Moral Grounds
by www.SixWise.com
The United States of America. You can shout out your thoughts 
     freely to anyone who will listen, write a letter to the government 
     expressing your opinions about fast food, the school system, 
     health care -- just about anything -- but you may not be able 
     to get your birth control pill from your corner drugstore. 
     Not if the pharmacist there has moral or religious objections 
     to it.
      Pharmacists in at least 12 states, including California, 
     Washington, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Texas, 
     New Hampshire, Ohio and North Carolina, have refused to fill 
     prescriptions for birth control pills or emergency contraception 
     like the Plan B or "morning-after" pill, in some 
     cases causing women to miss pills or the time-sensitive window 
     in which the Plan B pill is most effective.
      
      
       |  
         
      Tiny pills at the heart of a  
        major controversy. 
        | 
     
      
      Says Steven H. Aden of the Christian Legal Society's Center 
     for Law and Religious Freedom in Annandale, which defends 
     the pharmacists:
       
     "This is a very big issue that's just beginning to 
       surface. More and more pharmacists are becoming aware of 
       their right to conscientiously refuse to pass objectionable 
       medications across the counter. We are on the very front 
       edge of a wave that's going to break not too far down the 
       line."
      
      "Just Fill the Prescription"
      When a pharmacist near Fort Worth, Texas refused to fill 
     a birth control prescription because she didn't believe in 
     it, the customer, 33-year-old Lacey, was not able to get her 
     pills until the next day, and missed taking one. 
      "I was shocked," said Lacey. "Their job is 
     not to regulate what people take or do. It's just to fill 
     the prescription that was ordered by my physician."
      Still, some pharmacists feel it's their right not to give 
     out drugs that go against their moral beliefs, regardless 
     of whether or not the patient has a prescription.
      "There are pharmacists who will only give birth control 
     pills to a woman if she's married. There are pharmacists who 
     mistakenly believe contraception is a form of abortion and 
     refuse to prescribe it to anyone," said Adam Sonfield 
     of the Alan Guttmacher Institute in New York, which follows 
     reproductive issues. "There are even cases of pharmacists 
     holding prescriptions hostage, where they won't even transfer 
     it to another pharmacy when time is of the essence."
      Along with refusing to fill prescriptions (and even give 
     them back to the patient to take elsewhere, in some cases), 
     some women have also received lectures from the pharmacists. 
      
      "I shouldn't, as a mom, if I'm driving into my drive-through 
     pharmacy, have to get into a moral debate with my pharmacist 
     on the way to picking up my kids over whether I should have 
     my birth control pills prescription filled," said Rep. 
     Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla.
      Right now, legislation varies from state to state, with some 
     states giving pharmacists the right to refuse, and others 
     requiring them to fill all prescriptions.
      Illinois, for instance, was the first state in the nation 
     to issue an emergency ruling requiring all the state's pharmacists 
     to fill "morning-after" pill prescriptions, without 
     delay, regardless of personal beliefs. The ruling came after 
     a Jewel-Osco pharmacist in Chicago's Loop refused to fill 
     two prescriptions for a "morning-after" pill. 
      "What's next?" asked Nancy Keenan, president of 
     NARAL-Pro Choice America, "They're not going to give 
     HIV and AIDS medication? Not going to give cholesterol medications 
     because they think you should exercise a little bit more?" 
      
      Pharmacists Have Rights, Too
      
      
       |  
         
      "We don't have a profession 
        of robots," says Susan  
        Winckler of the American 
        Pharmacists Association. 
        | 
     
      
      "I refuse to dispense a drug with a significant mechanism 
     to stop human life," says Karen Brauer, who was fired 
     in 1996 after refusing to refill a birth control prescription 
     at a Kmart near Cincinnati, Ohio.
      Brauer is also the president of the 1,500-member Pharmacists 
     for Life International. "Our group was founded with the 
     idea of returning pharmacy to a healing-only profession. What's 
     been going on is the use of medication to stop human life. 
     That violates the ideal of the Hippocratic oath that medical 
     practitioners should do no harm," she says.
      The 50,000-member American Pharmacists Association maintains 
     a policy that a pharmacist can refuse to fill a prescription 
     for moral reasons, but they must have an alternative available 
     for the patient to get the pills. Says Susan C. Winckler, 
     the association's vice president for policy and communications:
      
     "We don't have a profession of robots. We have a profession 
       of humans. We have to acknowledge that individual pharmacists 
       have individual beliefs. What we suggest is that they identify 
       those situations ahead of time and have an alternative system 
       set up so the patient has access to their therapy."
      
      A Bill to Make Everyone Happy?
      To curb this controversy that's disrupting increasing numbers 
     of pharmacies and patients, Congress is now considering a 
     bill, as of September 2005, that would allow pharmacists to 
     refuse to fill a prescription if another person at the same 
     location could fill it. 
      The bill places the burden of filling the prescription on 
     the store, rather than on the patient as is now sometimes 
     the case. 
      If the bill is passed, pharmacies that violate the ruling 
     could be fined up to $5,000 a day and face civil lawsuits 
     from patients. 
      
      
         | 
        
       Please 
        Let Us Know What YOU Think 
      Select answers will be published in the forthcoming 
        issue of the SixWise.com e-newsletter!* 
      *NOTE: 
      Your answer, or an excerpt thereof, may be published in 
      a forthcoming issue of the SixWise.com e-newsletter and 
      on the website. By submitting your answer you authorize 
      this. Please include your name and your city state (or 
      country) location to be included in the publication of 
      select answers! | 
     
      
      Recommended Reading
      Want 
     to Reduce PMS? Eat Some Cheese, Get Some Sun and Take These 
     Other Steps
      The 
     Gender Income Gap: Are Women Really Making Less than Men for 
     the Same Job?
      
      
      
      Sources
      Fox 
     News August 4, 2005
      Washington 
     Post: Pharmacists' Rights at Front of New Debate
      USA 
     Today: Druggists Refuse to Give Out Pill
      The 
     Journal Editorial Report
      Daily 
     Illini Editorial: What's in a Job?